Ahmed Zahid Hamidi was alleged to have taken a bribe of round RM5 crore when he was the House Minister.

Shah Alam: Ahmed Zahid Hamidi has been acquitted of 40 prices of accepting a bribe from an organization to increase the International Visa System (VLN) contract.

Excessive Court docket Decide Yazeed Mustafa dominated that the prosecution had failed to determine a prima facie case towards the Umno President.

Zahid, 69, was accused of receiving bribes of S$13.56 million (RM42 million) from Extremely Kirana Sdn Bhd (UKSB) because the then House Minister, with a purpose to lengthen the agency’s contract as an operator of a one-stop heart Can go China and to keep up a contract for the availability of VLN system in addition to VLN built-in system.

He was additionally charged with seven different counts of receiving S$1.15 million, RM3 million, 15,000 Swiss Francs and US$15,000 from the identical firm in connection together with his official duties.

Between October 2014 and March 2018, the offenses have been alleged to have been dedicated at Seri Satria in Precinct 16, Putrajaya and Nation Heights, Kajang.

Zahid continues to be dealing with 35 prices within the Kuala Lumpur Excessive Court docket for cash laundering and legal breach of belief of hundreds of thousands from Yayasan Akalbudi and accepting bribes for varied tasks throughout his tenure as dwelling minister.

In his resolution, Yazeed mentioned the prosecution’s case broke down as his three key witnesses – former UKSB director Harry Lee, Van Koris Shah Wan Abdul Ghani and David Tan – have been unreliable and never credible.

Additional, a ledger which listed funds purportedly to ministers, politicians and civil servants didn’t help the proof of the three.

“The prosecution couldn’t set up a prima facie case as all three weren’t credible and (unreliable),” he mentioned.

Yazeed mentioned that Tan had claimed to have paid Zahid Rs 30 lakh, however this was not talked about in his witness assertion.

“In the course of the cross-examination, he agreed that fee was a consideration,” he mentioned.

The decide mentioned that Tan additionally didn’t present any rationalization as to why totally different code names of Zahid have been included within the bookkeeping.

Umno president Ahmed Zahid Hamidi greets supporters exterior the Shah Alam Excessive Court docket after being acquitted of corruption prices.

Tan had ready the ledger utilizing Microsoft Excel sheet on his laptop computer laptop.

In bookkeeping, he used code names for Zahid, corresponding to Monster, Mon, YB, Younger Boy, ZH and Z.

Yazid mentioned that even Lee was not in a position to say with certainty that the cash he took from Tan was given to Zahid primarily based on feedback within the ledger.

He added that even the bookkeeping doesn’t help Van Coris’ oral proof.

The decide additionally criticized prosecutors for not calling the particular person recognized as Nicole Tan, whose title appeared in almost each web page of the e-book.

He additionally rejected the protection’s argument that Zahid was unfairly prosecuted.

“Certainly, the accused was represented by a reliable protection crew led by senior legal lawyer Hishyam Te Poh Tek,” he mentioned, including that the attorney-general had the discretion as to whom he wished to cost.

Yazeed additionally didn’t settle for the protection of political donations given by Zahid’s lawyer.

“It have to be proven that such donations have been spent purely on political actions,” he mentioned.

Attorneys Hamidi Noh, Ahmed Zaidi Zainal, Aiman ​​Abdul Rahman, Fatini Athira Bahrain, Sharif Anfiza Al-Shahab Syed Fadzil, Noor Khairunnisa Sabira Abdul Manan and Nabiha Mer Azli additionally appeared for Zahid.

Deputy Public Prosecutors Raja Rosela Raja Toran, Wan Shahruddin Van Ladin, Abdul Malik Ayob, Xander Lim and Thawani Balakrishnan appeared for the prosecution.

we’re stay on telegram subscribe Right here For breaking information and newest bulletins.

Supply hyperlink