These commenting on a viral Web publish have been thought of a significant crimson flag on a preferred job-review web site.
In a Reddit publish revealed on r/antiwork, Redditor u/NoCreativeHunch shared a screenshot of an alert it obtained from Glassdoor, a web site that enables workers to anonymously evaluation former employers. The headline, “I’ve by no means seen this on Glassdoor earlier than! Is that this an indication to keep away from this employer?” The viral publish has garnered practically 40,000 votes in simply 6 hours.
After clicking on an employer on Glassdoor’s web site, u/NoCreativeHunch stated they have been met with a “Glassdoor alert” warning them to proceed with warning.
Proven within the screenshot, the alert reads: “Glassdoor Alert: Employer Authorized Motion. This employer has taken authorized motion towards reviewers and/or Glassdoor for evaluations that seem on this profile. Please do your finest when evaluating this employer.” Use judgment.”
Glassdoor, which boasts 54 million distinctive month-to-month viewers and evaluations from greater than 2 million employers, goals to take a better take a look at employers from the attitude of present and former workers.
“Glassdoor’s mission is to be a trusted and clear platform that helps individuals all over the place discover jobs,” the corporate’s web site reads.
A useful resource aimed toward serving to job seekers, Glassdoor has come beneath heavy scrutiny from employers receiving destructive evaluations. And in excessive circumstances, employers have taken authorized motion towards the web site.
Nevertheless, regardless of the intense authorized implications, Glassdoor is cautious in notifying its customers about efforts to dam destructive evaluations in addition to growing constructive evaluation numbers.
“Glassdoor will publish an alert on an employer’s profile and evaluation pages when an employer takes authorized motion towards reviewers and/or Glassdoor for evaluations that seem on their profile, or if we now have proof that somebody has taken steps to artificially enhance the score for an employer,” a Glassdoor spokesperson advised newsweek,
He stated, “Typically, employers do not like what workers and/or former workers must say… it is our customary to battle on behalf of customers, to guard their anonymity and rights to free speech.” It is apply.”
For tens of millions of potential workers every year, Glassdoor and different job-review web sites are sometimes step one within the utility course of.
Naturally, corporations with constructive evaluations and ceaselessly up to date profiles usually tend to appeal to extra candidates. Corporations with destructive evaluations and inactive profiles are prone to appeal to the other.
Based on the Society for Human Useful resource Administration, Glassdoor supplies job seekers with the “actual scoop” on what it is wish to work from Amazon to employers of small, native companies.
Whereas employers usually publish detailed job descriptions on LinkedIn, Certainly and different comparable web sites, many potential workers will need to hear from present or former workers about office environments, doubtlessly poisonous cultures, and different deciding elements earlier than submitting purposes.
Within the feedback part of the viral Reddit publish, customers acknowledged the significance of firsthand job evaluations, encouraging the unique poster to not apply to the corporate that obtained the Glassdoor alert.
“Appears to be like like they’re attempting to silence former employers,” wrote Redditor u/AnthonyDigitalMedia in a remark that has been obtained greater than 5,300 occasions.
“Avoid that firm and by no means work for them,” he stated.
In a separate remark, one other Redditor stated that the Glassdoor alert proven within the authentic publish serves as a warning to potential candidates.
“That is additionally a warning to potential workers, ‘Strive something unusual like asking for references to former workers and we are going to take authorized motion towards you,'” he wrote.
Redditor u/Weeble228, whose response garnered practically 1,000 votes, shared the opinion that employers ought to by no means reply to destructive evaluations, it doesn’t matter what the circumstances.
“As an organization you by no means clap on evaluations from workers or clients,” he remarked. “It’s going to by no means be good for the corporate.”